Jurnal Internasional S3 MP
Improving Non-Formal Education Services Sanggar Learning Activities Through Program Evaluation Using the Cipp Method
Evaluation of Program area is an activity to process and provide various forms of equipment that can be applied to obtain valid, reliable and reliable data. Program evaluation is a tool that can be used to solve problems that are questioned by the public because they involve the public interest. The approach in this study used a qualitative approach with the CIPP model to evaluate the results and benefits of the NonFormal Education program at the Bogor Regency Government Learning Center. The basic orientation in this study is to collect, obtain, and provide useful information to assess alternative decision-making for improvement and improvement of the Non-Formal Education program at the Bogor Regency Government Learning Activity Center. The method used in this research is the program evaluation method with the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model developed by Stufflebeam which consists of formative evaluation and summative evaluation. Formative evaluation includes context, input and process components while summative evaluation includes product components. Referring to the results of data analysis on program activities in PNF SKB Bogor, the general assessment concluded that the Context component was in the "Good and Enough" category, the Input component was in the "Good and Enough" category, the Process component was in the "Good" category, the Product component was in the "Good" category. ". Formative evaluation includes context, input and process components while summative evaluation includes product components. Referring to the results of data analysis on program activities in PNF SKB Bogor Regency, the general assessment concluded that the Context component was in the "Good and Enough" category, the Input component was in the "Good and Enough" category, the Process component was in the "Good" category, the Product component was in the "Good" category. ". Formative evaluation includes context, input and process components while summative evaluation includes product components. Referring to the results of data analysis on program activities in PNF SKB Bogor, the general assessment concluded that the Context component was in the "Good and Enough" category, the Input component was in the "Good and Enough" category, the Process component was in the "Good" category, the Product component was in the "Good" category. "
Tidak ada salinan data
Tidak tersedia versi lain